2009 Fantasy Football Draft Sheet
2009 Fantasy Football Draft Sheet
image

I’ve been spending some time lately looking at carries and yardage for top rushers so far this season – yesterday I tweeted about Michael Turner being on pace for 370+ carries with his 50 rushes in two games against Miami and Carolina. It started me thinking about those running backs that have had a lot of carries so far – has their yardage matched their carries? Have they played against weak run defenses? And what can this tell us about their future performances?

So let’s start by taking a look at the top 10 rushers based on yardage through Week 2:

Rank Running Back Rushing Yards
1 Adrian Peterson 272 yards
2 Chris Johnson 254 yards
3 Frank Gore 237 yards
4 Mike Bell 229 yards
5 Fred Jackson 220 yards
6 Cedric Benson 217 yards
7 Marion Barber 203 yards
8 Ronnie Brown 179 yards
9 Steven Jackson 171 yards
10 Michael Turner 170 yards

 

Meanwhile, here are the top ten rushers based on carries through Week 2:

Rank Running Back Carries
1 Michael Turner50 carries
2 Cedric Benson 50 carries
3 Mike Bell 45 carries
4 Fred Jackson 43 carries
5 Adrian Peterson 40 carries
6 Kevin Smith 39 carries
7 Frank Gore 38 carries
8 Matt Forte 38 carries
9 Clinton Portis 35 carries
10 Larry Johnson 35 carries


I compared the two lists to see which guys had a lot of carries but not a lot of yards. Now to some extent this could just say something about how strong of a runner the RB is, and how many yards he can – or can’t – muscle out, but I’d argue it also has something to do with the rush defenses the RB has faced in Weeks 1 and 2. If the player faced tough run defenses but still had plenty of carries, then perhaps we can expect better yardage in the future against weaker run Ds? It might still be a little early to run this analysis, but hey, why not give it a whirl? I took a look at the players with lots of carries and relatively low yardage and averaged the ranking of the two team rush defenses that they faced (ranking gathered from ESPN) and here’s what we find:

Running Back Carries Rushing Yards Rushing Yards Rankings Rushing D Average Ranknig
Kevin Smith 39 103 yards 26th 10th
Matt Forte 38 84 yards 36th 13.5th
Clinton Portis 38 141 yards 14th 26th
Larry Johnson 35 98 yards 29th 10.5th


Smith, Forte, and Johnson all met teams with relatively decent rush defenses but Clinton Portis sticks out a bit here – he played against the Giants, whose rush defense is currently ranked 27th, and the Rams, whose rush defense is oddly slightly better but still only comes in at 26th overall. To me this says that Portis can probably be expected to put up about 70 rushing yards per game against mediocre to poor rush defenses and perhaps less when playing better run Ds if this 2-game pattern holds true. Good news for Portis owners though – he faces the Lions, Bucs, and Panthers over the next three weeks, all of which have pretty weak run defenses. Here’s hoping Portis can capitalize on his great schedule ahead.

In order to figure out what might happen with Smith, Forte, and Johnson though, let’s take a look at their opponents for the next three weeks (opponent listed with their rush defense ranking in parentheses):

Running Back Week 3 Opponent Week 4 Opponent Week 5 Opponent
Kevin Smith Redskins (17) Bears (12) Steelers (7)
Matt Forte Seahawks (26) Lions (22) Falcons (19)
Clinton Portis Lions (22) Buccaneers (27) Panthers (27)
Larry Johnson Eagles (16) Giants (27) Cowboys (23)


Smith’s future opponents average a rush defense ranking of 12th, while Forte and Johnson have a much kinder schedule with their opponents’ rush defenses both averaging around 22nd. Of course this relies upon the 2-week trends staying true, but Forte and Johnson owners should expect to see an increase in yardage over the next three weeks as their schedules suddenly get a little easier on the rush defense front.

What about the flip side – which players had top 10 yardage but maybe not a relatively large number of carries to go along with the yards?

Running Back Carries Russhing Yard Number of Carries Ranking Rush D Average Ranking
Chris Johnson 31 254 yards 17th 20.5th
Marion Barber 32 203 yards 15th 29th
Steven Jackson 33 171 yards 14th 21.5th


Now keep in mind the number of carries isn’t particularly low for these guys but relative to the amount of yards they have, it’s worth looking at the average ranking of their opponent’s rush defense. As you can see above, all faced fairly poor run defenses.

Running Back Week 3 Opponent Week 4 Opponent Week 5 Opponent
Chris Johnson Jets (6) Jags (13) Colts (30)
Marion Barber Panthers (27) Broncos (10) Chiefs (21)
Steven Jackson Packers (18) 49ers (3) Vikings (15)


Johnson, Barber, and Jackson will see an average of the 16th, 19th, and 12th run defenses respectively over the course of the next three weeks, which clearly is a bit harder than what they have faced so far, but not by a large degree. Chris Johnson might have a tougher matchup against the Jets in Week 3, but he should pay out big time in Week 5 against the Colts. Steven Jackson should have relative ease in Weeks 3 and 5 while Week 4 against a surprisingly highly-ranked 49ers run defense could be more of a battle.

With Marion Barber out for 1-2 weeks with a quad injury, it makes his case even more interesting. Felix Jones has 118 yards (18th best) on a mere 13 carries (44th best). Expect a big week from Jones when they meet the Panthers in Week 3 and the Chiefs in Week 5. It’s hard to believe my beloved Broncos might actually be the 10th best run defense in the league but if that’s the case, Week 4 might be the toughest matchup in the next few weeks for the Cowboys’ RBs. 


To see other articles written by the Fantasy Football Librarian click here…. A Librarian’s Touch Archives


The Bruno Boys are pleased to once again welcome guest columnist, Sara Holladay, back for her feature,A Librarian’s Touch, for the 2009 season. The woman behind the web-site, Fantasy Football Librarian, Holladay is someone all fantasy owners should be well familiar with if they want to win their league’s title as she provides some of the best fantasy football insight and resources found around the web!

Jrod691

Jrod691

Posted at 9:37 Sep 23, 2009

It is WAY too early to do an analysis like this. The Giants are ranked 27th precisely because MBIII and Felix Jones ran all over them last week. You should know better than to crunch numbers like this when one of the biggest assumptions is that a team like the GIANTS are the 27th best rush D in the league.

The reverse can be said about your “beloved Broncos.” Let’s see the Broncos have faced CEDRIC BENSON and JAMAL LEWIS so far. Everyone knows that neither the Browns nor the Bengals have elite rushing attacks so of course the Broncos are going to be ranked high two weeks into the season.

I usually like your columns and while this IS a good idea, it is far too early in the season to be doing this sort of analysis.

FFLibrarian

FFLibrarian

Posted at 3:44 Sep 27, 2009

Thanks for the feedback, Jrod, and glad to hear you normally like my columns. I agree that it’s early, as I noted multiple times in the article (including my comments that it really is hard to believe my Broncos could have the 10th best rush defense; that does not seem possible), but I disagree that it’s too early. I think we’ll know a lot more this week but I think it’s worth challenging some of the early assumptions we have about defenses, such as being certain that the Giants will have a strong rush D or that the Broncos will lay down and succomb to RBs each and every week as in 2008. The NYG matchup today with TB was obviously a much different picture, but I think it remains interesting to investigate these things early on. Are Barber and Jones really that good or could there be kinks in the Giants D?

That said, yes, this will be much stronger in a few weeks - looking forward to your feedback then, too!

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?