Rodgers, Garrard, or Freeman???

Green Bay or Indy defense???

Thoughts and opinions are welcome and appreciated ...

Thanks!

1-pt/50 yds, bonus over 100 rushing/receiving, 300 passing; other scoring normal. No flex, no PPR

QB-Rodgers, Garrard, Freeman
RB-Turner, Pierre Thomas, Benson, Forsett, Jennings
WR-Ochocinco, Sims-Walker, Smith (CAR), Burleson, Avant
TE-Clark, H. Miller
K-Prater
DEF-GB, Indy

vbsuds - 02 January 2010 11:57 AM

Rodgers, Garrard, or Freeman???

Green Bay or Indy defense???

Thoughts and opinions are welcome and appreciated ...

Thanks!

1-pt/50 yds, bonus over 100 rushing/receiving, 300 passing; other scoring normal. No flex, no PPR

QB-Rodgers, Garrard, Freeman
RB-Turner, Pierre Thomas, Benson, Forsett, Jennings
WR-Ochocinco, Sims-Walker, Smith (CAR), Burleson, Avant
TE-Clark, H. Miller
K-Prater
DEF-GB, Indy

VB - This would be a lot easier if Mike McCarthy wasn’t so secretive about what his plans are with the Packers skill players. However, with it being a late game you won’t have the opportunity to sit around and see if McCarthy breaks any late news regarding the situation. With that being said, I’d roll with David Garrard and hope he does just enough to make it a decent afternoon from your QB. The weather isn’t looking good in Cleveland but Garrard usually does a nice job of using his legs in situations like this and he should be in the 10-12 point range.  If the weather scares you away and Matt Moore is available on your waiver wire he might be worth a shot. New Orleans is likely to rest their defensive starters and even without Steve Smith, Moore is a decent play in supposed nice weather.

I;m not a big fan of either defense because they will likely be playing their back-ups but if I had to choose it’s the Packers who get the nod. There starters will be in the football game longer than the Colts starters and that’s the deciding factor in my opinion.

Best of Luck in Week 17.